this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
525 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck AI

3656 readers
517 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thteven@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They nailed the smile way better than the other one.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't even look like the same dog. And where are the flowers coming from? What is this supposed to be, bizzarro world?

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I don't think that 2nd place drawing is necessarily repeating the same dog.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The addition of the flowers gives me "tattoo of a pet that died" vibes, which makes the 2nd place drawing feel much sadder than the first place drawing.

[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh man I remember the debates around this being really illuminating. Like some people really don't see how heart can outperform technique

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 58 points 2 months ago
[–] mrbubblesort@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

I mean it's much more popular now than it ever would have been otherwise. I'm going to say that even in a hundred years it's going to stand above its contemporaries.

The story is just so human.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Here's some of mine. I might go back to making more.

[–] Scrappy@feddit.nl 12 points 2 months ago

Gut pull is S tier

[–] match@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago

i love gut pull

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 months ago
[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

These are great

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Almost ~~gutted~~ busted a lung over "gut pull". I think the shitty art enhances the humor.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago
[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 months ago
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I always imagine that Sweet Bro and Hella Jeff will be looked at by people 1000 years from now the same way we look at old art with weird babies and ass trumpets.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Truly high art

[–] jaredwhite@piefed.social 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is actually a really good point. Culture paved the way for the sheen of hyper "detailed" AI art (many of the details fall apart on close scrutiny, but I digress) by making it seem like "amateur" art is bad while "professional" art is good. So that means if a tool comes along that supposedly makes it so you can sidestep sweating over your amateur art and go straight to pumping out the professional-looking stuff, that's a win. It's good to question this assumption.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah like hyper realism. Just print it bro (I don't like hyper realism, there is no creative part in it IMO).

There were lots of similar discussions when the camera was invented, turns out it did take the job of soullessly copying things in paint away, but got used as a tool by artists.

There is no art in AI and will never be, but as it gets better it will be used as another tool for learning etc I guess.

[–] jaredwhite@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're driving at. It's true that the rise of photography had an effect on painting such that styles which moved away from realism became the norm for a while, but long since we've seen a shift back to realism and a continuation of detailed portraiture or landscape illustrative techniques among some artists.

My point simply is that people who lack the technique/talent to create "fine art" have come to believe their work is of no value, which I find upsetting because I'd much rather look at "bad" human-produced art than generated slop with the superficial appearance of fine technique.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

You're completely correct IMO, I was mostly blurbing about an event similar to AI. Back then you could finish a painting elsewhere thanks to a snapped photo, today people can prompt up a specific scene and train off of that one. IMO it's just tools, but you're right, some people believe they are artists just because they "prompt" up a hashed copy of the masters.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I'm sad that I forgot about Sweet Bro and Hella Jeff, but I'm happy to see it again

[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 2 months ago

i mean he's right but he probably shouldn't have chosen examples by actual artists trying their hardest to make something ugly as sin.

[–] match@pawb.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

this post is NOT free of homestuck

[–] LupertEverett@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

You can't escape the Homestuck

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sweet Bro and Hella Jeff is a stone cold classic.

The sock ruse was a........ distaction.

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

flip it turn ways!!

[–] LupertEverett@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I got the car

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago

That art was made with meaning and soul, no mindless soulless machine can ever do that

[–] PleaseLetMeOut@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Let me introduce you all to: Sassy the Sasquatch. Made entirely in MS Paint.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

You fukkin' druggo.

[–] Event_Horizon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Whatchutalkinabout?

[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

AI "art" is just soulless. Everything is too clean and perfect, assuming it doesn't churn out some uncanny shit.

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

Who is dankey kang?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

get a load of THIS hornses ass

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Brutalmoose: Must go quick!

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

AI has no chance of ever creating Tim & Eric. Shithead is also a classic example.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oh my gog

It keeps happening

And it never stops

load more comments
view more: next ›