this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
34 points (84.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

32400 readers
1121 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Money gets created in the USD economy all the time, whether by invented debt, cash printing, or the issuance of bonds. Does that money actually represent wealth? Does the USD economy actually contribute anything of value?

So let's say you wanted to permanently remove value from the USD economy for some reason. What's the most effective and impactful way to "burn money?" Not spend it. Not acquire it. Destroy it, with the goal of taking that value out of the economy.

Burning/ shredding physical cash seems really inefficient. Maybe the answer lies in devaluing real estate?

This is all hypothetical so assume whatever resources or labor you want.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

That’s called taxes. That’s literally what taxes are, destruction of currency. Go pay your taxes to the treasury in cash, they will literally shred it.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago

Create a virus that only targets dollars.

[–] Bael422@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Remove the peoples trust/value from it. Make societies (even small scale households/towns) around a currency-less system with things taken care of by each other using no money, just an agreement (it's how communities used to work for thousands of years before capitalism, so it's completely do-able). Or use a new money if you wanna start the failed capitalistic orphan grinder up again. Essentially starve the currency from trust/value to people and its value goes back to what it was, nothing. Money has no intrinsic value so if you make systems outside of that currency that stops people from requiring it, all the made up value goes back to zero.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Inflation. Make the currency worthless.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Destroying money would make it more valuable.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That would be deflation - which is its own problem

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Taxes. The government can just print more money to pay for everything, but instead they tax to take that money out of the system

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want to know how to reduce the value of the dollar as a currency, you may want to look at what Trump has been doing since he entered Office.

Otherwise, I'm not sure to understand the question.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dollar value is still not go down tho.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Consequences will happen eventually.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

devaluing the dollar, basically if countries stop trading to the USA, it will be like the ruble, pratically worthless if not for the yuan.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago

Removing currency isn't the same as removing value.

The quickest way to remove currency is raising the reverse ratio.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

'Destroying' money, either physically burning banknotes or just setting some numbers to a lower value in a digital ledger, does not remove value from the economy. When you create money, usually through debt, it takes its value from the currency that already exists. Money is also destroyed all the time through the payment of debt but not as fast as it's created, that's why its value mostly goes down (prices mostly go up): Money printer goes BRRRRRRRRR, money burner goes brrr.

What matters for an economy, and therefore the value of its currency, is the value they create–simply put, how much resources they exploit and how efficiently. The most important resource (in my opinion at least) is people.

So if you want to remove value from an economy you have to take those resources away, or make them hard or impossible to exploit efficiently by them, or make them obsolete...

What matters for an economy, and therefore the value of its currency, is the value they create–simply put, how much resources they exploit and how efficiently

Yeah, thats the way it ought to be, its actually slightly different, and is very important in the context of what a country does to undermine it's own currency, or even a companies director does to the value of their company.

Value is a question of perception. How much are people/investors willing to tolerate and still perceive the value in a good or service or currency.

Its the reason the massive quantitative easing ended up spreading so widely as a tool in the last 15 years. In the beginning it was assumed that the massive 'money printing' would lead to massive devaluations, which didn't really happen as expected. Thats because the reaction in value percieptions in those currencies ended being more flexible than central bankers and economists initially feared.

The perception of value played a role in how long it took for people in the US to recognise the real estate bubble exploding in 07-08. It plays a role in really any bubble, and is why prices drastically plummet instead of taper. The value perception changes en masse, and bang, everybody runs for the door.

One more interesting example is the value perception comparison of essential workers in the COVID19 Pandemic compared to normal times.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

emp bombs in the right places

[–] VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

~~EMP bombs are not real~~

I was wrong, EMP bombs are real

https://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb3.htm

Also research HERF guns. I suggested them for IEDs but the researcher I talked to said the military was far beyond that idea.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

idgaf you corrected yourself, the fact you so arrogantly insisted in your ignorance in the first place earned you a block

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Would the plot of Goldfinger help here? 🤔

What would happen if you nuked Fort Knox? Especially now that the dollar isn't backed by gold?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

1: Invest in crypto 2: Invest in AI 3: Buy high, sell low

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 day ago

Before I answer,how much research have you done into the creation of the federal reserve, the mechanisms it uses, and the outcomes it seeks to achieve?

Just want to know what level of baseline knowledge this conversation should assume

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

Create a new currency using USD as a base; stop printing USD, re-evaluate USD to be near worthless compared to new currency (1 USD : 100 N(ew)USD

Following this, implement either hyperinflation after USD is largely switched over, and it'll destroy 99% of value, or you can stop printing right after, and NUSD will quickly devolve lower than it can even be represented, leading to inflating prices, and less use of NUSD in place of literally anything else, with no access of USD to even return to

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Give it to the KLF.

Become President and do exactly what Trump is doing.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Money gets created in the USD economy all the time, whether by invented debt, cash printing, or the issuance of bonds.

The Federal Reserve targets about a 2% inflation rate:

https://www.federalreserve.gov/economy-at-a-glance-inflation-pce.htm

What is the Fed's inflation target?

The Federal Reserve seeks to achieve inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run as measured by the annual change in the price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE).

...but that's not something unique to the dollar. Other countries will have central banks that will do the same thing.

For the euro, this is the European Central Bank:

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/strategy/pricestab/html/index.en.html

The ECB’s Governing Council, after concluding its strategy review in July 2021, considers that price stability is best maintained by aiming for 2% inflation over the medium term.

For the British pound, the Bank of England:

https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation

We are responsible for keeping inflation (price rises) low and stable. The Government has set us a target of keeping inflation at 2%

Just part of keeping a functional economy.

So let's say you wanted to permanently remove value from the USD economy for some reason.

I think what you're wanting to do is to decrease the money supply, which you wouldn't normally call "removing value from the economy".

You don't normally want to see deflation, as deflationary spirals create problems:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflation

A deflationary spiral is a situation where decreases in the price level lead to lower production, which in turn leads to lower wages and demand, which leads to further decreases in the price level.

But the Federal Reserve can and does create deflationary pressure, reduces the rate of inflation:

https://www.stlouisfed.org/in-plain-english/expansionary-and-contractionary-policy

How Contractionary Monetary Policy Works

Suppose that inflation has exceeded 2 percent for some time and the Fed recognizes that individuals are starting to expect high and rising inflation going forward. In this situation, the FOMC might decide to use contractionary monetary policy to bring actual and expected inflation back toward its target, to maintain price stability.

To do this, the FOMC could raise its target range for the federal funds rate (FFR) and increase the administered rates—interest on reserve balances (IORB) rate, overnight reverse repurchase agreement (ON RRP) offering rate, and discount rate—accordingly.

[–] VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are incorrect about the goal. I am talking about destroying value, not reducing money supply.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Some of the things that you have in your post don't make much sense to me, then, since you're talking about the money supply in at least part of it: "Money gets created in the USD economy all the time, whether by invented debt, cash printing, or the issuance of bonds."

I'm not sure if it's really coherent to aim to "destroy value" in the "USD economy".

If you want to reduce the size of the US GDP


though that'd be linked to the US, rather than the US dollar


you could reduce that by reducing economic activity. Like, say everyone in the US works four days instead of five, and then there'd be less economic activity, and that would cause the GDP to decline.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Create and then destroy some crypto currencies and their trading places.

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

For the record the US Treasury does actually physically burn real money. When bills become too degraded, have errors, or generally aren't fit for circulation they need to be removed. They usually contract with an outside disposal company and the process is overseen by the secret service. Usually biomedical waste services have the necessary secure procedures and equipment to properly incinerate cash

Quantitative easing, heaps of pointless tariffs, a brain drain/immigration crackdown to get rid of all the cheapest and smartest labor, and broad policies of isolationism so that the dollar loses world reserve status.

All of this is already happening, and I halfway suppose the OP knows it.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Taxes. This is the most effective way to reduce the amount of money in a system

[–] CouncilOfFriends@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Give it to billionaires who will never need to spend it. I don't know how efficient it is, but we already have a system set up for it.